Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video63 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Dyer results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Bandwagon, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 47.25 hits. Analysis detected 173.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 63 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,529 of 28,364 speakers). This Stephen Dyer is worse (more manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Stephen Dyer
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 63
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.5% percentile
56.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos63 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Negativity Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos