Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video74 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steph Michaels results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52.7% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 179.557 faulty-reasoning hits from 74 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,061 of 28,364 speakers). This Steph Michaels is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Steph Michaels
Speaker details
Total words: 74
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.8% percentile
20.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos74 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 52.8%52.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 16.5%16.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.0%11.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.0%22.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 52.8%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos