Speaker summary
81%2 analyzed articles/videos405.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steffie Woolhandler results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Slippery Slope, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.7% saturation with 294 hits. Analysis detected 1,408.476 faulty-reasoning hits from 405.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (22,960 of 28,364 speakers). This Steffie Woolhandler is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Steffie Woolhandler
Speaker details
Total words: 405.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.1% percentile
13.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos405.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 47.7%47.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 32.3%32.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.9%10.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.9%12.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 47.7%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 32.3%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos