Speaker summary
74%1 analyzed article/video45.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stefanie Lesser results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 38.25 hits. Analysis detected 208.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 45.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (7,786 of 28,364 speakers). This Stefanie Lesser is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Stefanie Lesser
Speaker details
Total words: 45.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.6% percentile
54.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos45.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos