Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 427 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CHARLOTTE GRAHAM-MCLAY results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 517 hits . Analysis detected 3,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,912 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,914 of 6,362 authors). This CHARLOTTE GRAHAM-MCLAY is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. CHARLOTTE GRAHAM-MCLAY
Author details
Total words: 2,912
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.9% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 17.8%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst