Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video37.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Statistics Canada results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,319 of 28,364 speakers). This Statistics Canada is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Statistics Canada
Speaker details
Total words: 37.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.7% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos37.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos