Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video73.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stan Beard results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 249.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,380 of 26,730 speakers). This Stan Beard is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Stan Beard
Speaker details
Total words: 73.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
44.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos73.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 69.1%69.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 34.5%34.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 69.1%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos