Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Springs Preserve results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 133 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (14,897 of 26,963 speakers). This Springs Preserve is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Springs Preserve
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
28.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 17.1%17.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos