Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video44.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These SparkFire results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 39.7% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 32 faulty-reasoning hits from 44.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,761 of 28,364 speakers). This SparkFire is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
SparkFire
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 44.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
27.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos44.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos