Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacqueline Sweet results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,224 hits . Analysis detected 7,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,576 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,912 of 6,607 authors). This Jacqueline Sweet is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Jacqueline Sweet
Author details
Total words: 12,576
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst