Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video65 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sofia Szamosi results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Halo Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 83.1% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 216 faulty-reasoning hits from 65 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 83.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (5,081 of 28,364 speakers). This Sofia Szamosi is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Sofia Szamosi
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠83%Sofia Szamosi (selected)84%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 65
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.1% percentile
83.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos65 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 83.1%83.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 83.1%83.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 83.1%83.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 83.1%83.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 83.1%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 83.1%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 83.1%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 83.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos