Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video92 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sneha Choudhary results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 51.75 hits. Analysis detected 324.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 92 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,330 of 28,364 speakers). This Sneha Choudhary is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Sneha Choudhary
Speaker details
Total words: 92
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.0% percentile
34.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos92 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos