Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video23.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These SMAart Gallery & Studio results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 58.3% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 90 faulty-reasoning hits from 23.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,518 of 28,364 speakers). This SMAart Gallery & Studio is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
SMAart Gallery & Studio
Speaker details
Total words: 23.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
37.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos23.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 58.3%58.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 58.3%, sitewide 0.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos