Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These SLPS officials results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 271 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,664 of 28,364 speakers). This SLPS officials is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
SLPS officials
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠31%SLPS officials (selected)20%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 176
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
19.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos176 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.3%23.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos