Speaker summary
⁠56%3 analyzed articles/videos706.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sir Keir Starmer results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.8% saturation with 322 hits. Analysis detected 2,248 faulty-reasoning hits from 706.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,430 of 28,364 speakers). This Sir Keir Starmer is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Sir Keir Starmer
Speaker details
Total words: 706.5
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
025507510010.3% percentile
9.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos706.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.6%23.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 11.8%11.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 32.8%32.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.5%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos