Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simon Lafortune results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias and Status Quo Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 87 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (9,848 of 28,364 speakers). This Simon Lafortune is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Simon Lafortune
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510065.3% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos