Speaker summary
ā 66%1 analyzed article/video122.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sierra Villebrun results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Nature, and Representativeness Heuristic, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 51.9% saturation with 63.606 hits. Analysis detected 198.606 faulty-reasoning hits from 122.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.9% and a BS Rank of ā 54% (13,189 of 28,364 speakers). This Sierra Villebrun is worse (more manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Sierra Villebrun
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 54%Sierra Villebrun (selected)35%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 122.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.5% percentile
34.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos122.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 51.9%51.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 40.9%40.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Representativeness Heurisā€¦Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 23.4%23.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 51.9%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 40.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos