Author summary
⁠24%1 analyzed article/video1,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shubhanjana Das results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 253 hits. Analysis detected 2,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,237 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (3,165 of 6,316 authors). This Shubhanjana Das is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Shubhanjana Das
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠50%Shubhanjana Das (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,237
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510049.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos