Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video14 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sierra Nevada Corp. results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Anchoring Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 14 hits. Analysis detected 14 faulty-reasoning hits from 14 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,926 of 28,364 speakers). This Sierra Nevada Corp. is worse (more manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Sierra Nevada Corp.
Speaker details
Total words: 14
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

86% percentile
025507510086.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos14 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos