Speaker summary
⁠70%3 analyzed articles/videos41.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shri Thanedar results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 67.6% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 214.644 faulty-reasoning hits from 41.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,677 of 28,364 speakers). This Shri Thanedar is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Shri Thanedar
Speaker details
Total words: 41.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.3% percentile
37.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos41.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 67.6%67.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 51.4%51.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 61.3%61.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.2%16.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 67.6%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 61.3%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 51.4%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos