ICE Should Show It Hasn’t Been “Infiltrated by Violent Extremists,” Senator Urges 68%

By Matt Sledge62% Sam Biddle81%

6/12/2026, 5:37:23 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 63.8% saturation with 466 hits. Analysis detected 2,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 730 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61.9% and a BS Rank of 68% (6,609 of 20,515 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the article peer group.

A Democratic senator has asked newly confirmed Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin to explain the department’s racist social media presence and assure the agency has not been “infiltrated by violent extremists.” 
Sen. 
Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., pointed to a March bulletin from Colorado law enforcement analysts that was unearthed by The Intercept last month. 
It warned that DHS posts using language popular with neo-Nazis could inspire acts of far-right violence within the U.S. as well as prompt white supremacists to join the agency. 
The bulletin by the Colorado Information Analysis Center cited repeated instances of DHS recruitment posts spurring discussion among neo-Nazis about enlisting in ICE with the hope of spurring a race war. 
It noted at least one instance of white supremacists claiming online that someone in their organization “had already been a captain at an ICE-contracted detention facility.” 
The DHS posts, which sometimes appeared to borrow material verbatim from racist memes, songs, and tropes, were made as part of a recruiting push under then-DHS Secretary Kristi Noem. 
Noem and former U.S. 
Border Patrol official Greg Bovino, who became the public face of Trump’s draconian mass deportation agenda, were pushed out of their positions by the White House this year. 
Whitehouse said that Mullin should disavow his predecessor’s “dangerous recruitment campaign.” 
“I cannot believe that you support the messages associated with these recruitment campaigns, or want anyone under your supervision to use the imprimatur of the United States Government to promote those messages,” Whitehouse said in a letter dated Wednesday. 
In response to a request for comment, a DHS spokesperson criticized Whitehouse and the Colorado law enforcement analysts. 
The analysts' report came from a fusion center, part of a network of information clearinghouses for local, state and federal police that spread across the U.S. following 9/11. 
“It is gross that Senator Whitehouse and the state of Colorado are actively weaponizing official law enforcement bulletins to promote dangerous anti-ICE conspiracy theories,” the agency wrote in a statement. 
“Comparing recruitment efforts aimed at filling critical public safety roles to extremist rhetoric is not only absurd, but it also dangerously undermines the mission and sacrifices of federal officers.” 
Mullin also rejected criticism of the department’s social media accounts when he was questioned by Rep. 
Shri Thanedar, D-Mich., about the Colorado fusion center’s report at a June 3 hearing. 
“I’m very concerned that your department is promoting white nationalist, anti-immigrant sentiments on official social media accounts,” Thanedar said. 
Mullin brushed off Thanedar’s assertion that this concern was backed by the facts. 
“There is no facts,” Mullin said. 
“You throw out ‘nationalism,’ ‘Naziism,’ and that is exactly what causes the hatred and the violence that happens to our officers every single day.” 
Whitehouse initially wrote to Noem on Feb. 23 with a detailed list of questions about the origin of the ICE recruiting posts. 
Noem never responded, according to Whitehouse’s more recent letter. 
Since Trump installed Mullin atop DHS, the former U.S. senator from Oklahoma has taken small steps to distance the department from some of Noem’s most controversial moves, including a decision to lower training standards for newly hired ICE officers. 
DHS also appears to be posting fewer of the most provocative posts since Mullin took office. 
In his latest letter to Mullin, Whitehouse said he was still trying to get to the bottom of who authorized and crafted the posts. 
He'd also previously asked whether there were sufficient checks in place to prevent the hiring of individuals with connections to “violent extremist or terrorist organizations.” 
“DHS and ICE have deployed recruitment ads featuring white nationalist slogans, songs, and imagery while lowering recruitment standards—facilitating the hiring of agents with histories of violent extremism. 
I renew my request about what DHS has done to ensure it has not been infiltrated by violent extremists, and who is responsible for this dangerous recruitment campaign,” Whitehouse said in this week's letter. 
Noem has stayed out of the public eye since her March ouster, taking a role as special envoy for Trump's so-called Shield of the Americas program. 
Bovino has been more outspoken. 
He attended a “remigration” conference with white nationalists in Portugal. 
In an interview before the conference’s start, the now-retired Border Patrol commander-at-large compared himself approvingly to Nazi general Erwin Rommel, describing the Third Reich strategist as someone who captured the imagination of the public. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 2.8%The Intercept: 5.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.5%The Intercept: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Matt Sledge: 2.4%The Intercept: 3.0%Availability Heuristic6.4%This article: 4.2%Matt Sledge: 1.1%The Intercept: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.2%This article: 1.2%Matt Sledge: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.7%Hindsight Bias1.2%This article: 0.8%Matt Sledge: 0.7%The Intercept: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.8%This article: 14.1%Matt Sledge: 11.2%The Intercept: 9.3%Framing Effect14.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.3%Matt Sledge: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.4%Status Quo Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 1.2%The Intercept: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Matt Sledge: 1.4%The Intercept: 2.2%Pessimism Bias6.6%This article: 63.8%Matt Sledge: 12.0%The Intercept: 12.5%Negativity Bias63.8%This article: 2.5%Matt Sledge: 0.6%The Intercept: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 1.4%The Intercept: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Matt Sledge: 1.8%The Intercept: 1.8%In-Group Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 1.0%The Intercept: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 1.1%The Intercept: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Matt Sledge: 1.2%The Intercept: 1.3%Recency Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%Matt Sledge: 2.7%The Intercept: 2.5%Ad Hominem15.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.8%The Intercept: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.7%Matt Sledge: 3.0%The Intercept: 3.5%Appeal to Authority6.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 1.9%The Intercept: 2.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 3.7%Matt Sledge: 1.5%The Intercept: 1.7%Slippery Slope3.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.2%Matt Sledge: 5.7%The Intercept: 7.2%Hasty Generalization8.2%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 20.8%Matt Sledge: 6.3%The Intercept: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion20.8%This article: 4.0%Matt Sledge: 1.6%The Intercept: 1.4%Begging the Question4.0%This article: 16.3%Matt Sledge: 2.6%The Intercept: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 14.0%Matt Sledge: 0.7%The Intercept: 0.8%Burden of Proof14.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.8%Matt Sledge: 1.1%The Intercept: 2.3%Anecdotal7.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 13.8%Matt Sledge: 1.1%The Intercept: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)13.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 26.6%Matt Sledge: 2.6%The Intercept: 2.1%Unattributed Quote26.6%This article: 15.6%Matt Sledge: 2.1%The Intercept: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection15.6%This article: 19.9%Matt Sledge: 8.4%The Intercept: 10.7%Biased Writer Voice19.9%This article: 6.3%Matt Sledge: 1.4%The Intercept: 2.1%Indoctrination6.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 4.9%The Intercept: 6.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Matt Sledge: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

730 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers51%attributed speech356writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSheldon Whitehouse • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageColorado Information Analysis Center • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageSheldon Whitehouse • 11 words • 100.0% coverageSheldon Whitehouse • 39 words • 100.0% coverageDHS spokesperson • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDHS • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDHS • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageShri Thanedar • 14 words • 0.0% coverageShri Thanedar • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 6 words • 100.0% coverageMarkwayne Mullin • 24 words • 0.0% coverageSheldon Whitehouse • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageSheldon Whitehouse • 24 words • 0.0% coverageSheldon Whitehouse • 25 words • 100.0% coverageSheldon Whitehouse • 27 words • 100.0% coverageSheldon Whitehouse • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Shri Thanedar

58%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words8.8% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Indoctrination+57.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Shri Thanedar: 57.6%57.6%Quote-first Misdirection+48.0 ptsWriter: 9.6%Shri Thanedar: 57.6%57.6%Unattributed Quote+28.1 ptsWriter: 29.5%Shri Thanedar: 57.6%57.6%Biased Writer Voice-37.6 ptsWriter: 37.6%Shri Thanedar: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -11.0 ptsWriter: 11.0%Shri Thanedar: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.