Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video137.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shirley Blankson results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 63.8% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 568.234 faulty-reasoning hits from 137.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,441 of 28,364 speakers). This Shirley Blankson is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Shirley Blankson
Speaker details
Total words: 137.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
34.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos137.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 53.8%53.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 63.8%63.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 23.1%23.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.1%23.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 63.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 53.8%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 15.9%Horn Effect: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos