Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shinzo Abe results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.2% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 265.972 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,232 of 28,364 speakers). This Shinzo Abe is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Shinzo Abe
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
34.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 90.7%90.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 60.2%60.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 38.0%38.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 90.7%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 60.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos