Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video159 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shin-Mee Chang results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Quote-first Misdirection, and Overconfidence Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 331.212 faulty-reasoning hits from 159 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (22,018 of 28,364 speakers). This Shin-Mee Chang is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Shin-Mee Chang
Speaker details
Total words: 159
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.4% percentile
15.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos159 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.8%17.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos