Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Caelyn Pender results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Indoctrination , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.1% saturation with 101 hits . Analysis detected 732 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,252 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,363 authors). This Caelyn Pender is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Caelyn Pender
Author details
Total words: 3,252
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst