Speaker summary
80% 3 analyzed articles/videos 661.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shai Akabas results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 179.25 hits . Analysis detected 1,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 661.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,821 of 28,364 speakers). This Shai Akabas is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group. Shai Akabas
Speaker details
Total words: 661.5
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.0% percentile 8.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos661.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 22.7% 22.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 20.4% 20.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 26.9% Loss Aversion: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst