Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video55.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sgt. Rashad Hollis results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 81 faulty-reasoning hits from 55.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,473 of 28,364 speakers). This Sgt. Rashad Hollis is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Sgt. Rashad Hollis
Speaker details
Total words: 55.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
19.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos55.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Loss Aversion: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 2.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 0.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 1.1%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos