Speaker summary
⁠41%2 analyzed articles/videos2,543.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seph Mozes results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 214.002 hits. Analysis detected 1,741.713 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,543.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,310 of 28,364 speakers). This Seph Mozes is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
Seph Mozes
Speaker details
Total words: 2,543.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Middle Ground: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos