Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senator Rand Paul results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Unattributed Quote, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 65% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,457 of 28,364 speakers). This Senator Rand Paul is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Senator Rand Paul
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
65.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 60.0%60.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 60.0%60.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 40.0%40.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 60.0%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 60.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos