Speaker summary
65% 2 analyzed articles/videos 461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Semona Holmes results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 154 hits . Analysis detected 862.294 faulty-reasoning hits from 461 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (25,800 of 27,567 speakers). This Semona Holmes is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Semona Holmes
Speaker details
Total words: 461
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.4% percentile 7.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos461 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 22.1% 22.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 20.0% 20.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 9.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 2.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst