Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Emily Jones results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 545 hits . Analysis detected 2,918 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,404 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Emily Jones is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Emily Jones
Author details
Total words: 5,404
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.1% 10.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.1%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst