Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Selena Fragassi results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 52 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,844 of 28,364 speakers). This Selena Fragassi is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Selena Fragassi
Speaker details
Total words: 26
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510086.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos26 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos