Speaker summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 486.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These SEIU—United Health Wealth results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.4% saturation with 206.261 hits . Analysis detected 1,635.828 faulty-reasoning hits from 486.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.3% and a BS Rank of 27% (20,707 of 28,364 speakers). This SEIU—United Health Wealth is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group. SEIU—United Health Wealth
Speaker details
Total words: 486.5
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.0% percentile 17.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos486.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 40.4% 40.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 24.3% 24.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 20.8% 20.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 18.5% 18.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 17.8% 17.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 42.4% 42.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 16.0% 16.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 16.0% 16.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 21.3% 21.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 24.3% 24.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 42.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 2.2% Tu Quoque: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 0.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Burden of Proof: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% Red Herring: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.7% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst