Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seema Shah results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Ad Hominem, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 67.8% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,304 of 26,730 speakers). This Seema Shah is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Seema Shah
Speaker details
Total words: 90
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
40.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos90 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 67.8%67.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 32.2%32.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 67.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos