Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video63 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle’s mayor results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 214 faulty-reasoning hits from 63 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,471 of 28,364 speakers). This Seattle’s mayor is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Seattle’s mayor
Speaker details
Total words: 63
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.7% percentile
56.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos63 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 60.3%60.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 60.3%60.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 60.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 60.3%, sitewide 26.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 3.1%Special Pleading: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos