Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Screencaps results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,827 of 28,364 speakers). This Screencaps is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Screencaps
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510086.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos