OutKick88%

Golf officially has a new star after the US Open and it's Wyndham Clark's girlfriend Emily Tanner 56%

By Sean Joseph0%

6/22/2026, 11:10:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 66.5% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 1,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 391 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.3% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,469 of 21,182 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the article peer group.

Wyndham Clark won the U.S. 
Open on Sunday and, like her many years on Instagram have taught her, his girlfriend Emily Tanner was in the right place at the right time. 
She ran up to him on the 18th green at Shinnecock and celebrated the win with him. 
It was Clark’s second U.S. 
Open win in the last four years. 
His first after she served as his "good luck charm" at the Masters Par Three Contest earlier this year. 
After sealing the win over the weekend, he didn’t have to look for her. 
The moment wasn’t too big for Tanner, who has been on the Screencaps radar for a while now. 
That radar is a great place to be if you’re on Instagram, like she is, doing your thing too. 
It was mentioned in Screencaps on Saturday that she deserved to be given some credit for recharging the 32-year-old’s batteries and assisting him back into the win column. 
It was also predicted by Joe that she was on the verge of becoming golf’s next star. 
WYNDHAM CLARK'S GIRLFRIEND EMILY TANNER IS TURNING INTO A STAR AT THE US OPEN, ALYSSA MILANO BEGS AGAIN & MEAT 
That prediction has come true. 
A simple Google search of Emily Tanner’s name will prove that. 
She helped him get back in the win column before this past weekend when she became an official PGA Tour golf girlfriend by making her TV debut after his CJ Cup Byron Nelson win. 
ZERO BS. 
JUST DAKICH. 
TAKE THE DON'T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. 
DOWNLOAD NOW! 
On Monday, she took the celebration of the big U.S. 
Open win and her new attention to Instagram. 
She wrote, "The most deserving. 
You did it!! 
Love you so much @wyndhamclark ❤️🥹" 
Keep it simple and make the shot. 
She did that. 
The lights aren't too bright. 
OUTKICK IS NOW ON THE FOX APP: CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD 
What a weekend on and off the course. 
What a few months, for that matter. 
Tanner’s gone from good luck charm at Augusta National to U.S. 
Open champ with another win sprinkled in the mix for fun. 
Wyndham Clark might be back, and his girlfriend is a star. 
Good luck slowing these two down this summer. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 30.7%Sean Joseph: 10.0%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias30.7%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Sean Joseph: 7.5%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic7.4%This article: 4.3%Sean Joseph: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 2.0%Sean Joseph: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias2.0%This article: 2.8%Sean Joseph: 2.3%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias2.8%This article: 14.3%Sean Joseph: 5.6%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect14.3%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 2.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.5%Sean Joseph: 8.3%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias10.5%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Sean Joseph: 1.6%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Sean Joseph: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error6.6%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Sean Joseph: 0.6%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 33.5%Sean Joseph: 14.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect33.5%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 19.2%Sean Joseph: 5.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias19.2%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.3%Sean Joseph: 4.0%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority14.3%This article: 2.8%Sean Joseph: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma2.8%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 7.3%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 5.1%Sean Joseph: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring5.1%This article: 7.2%Sean Joseph: 2.7%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon7.2%This article: 2.6%Sean Joseph: 4.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion2.6%This article: 1.3%Sean Joseph: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question1.3%This article: 30.2%Sean Joseph: 15.7%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)30.2%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.9%Sean Joseph: 5.7%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal4.9%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 2.8%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.8%Sean Joseph: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote12.8%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 66.5%Sean Joseph: 30.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice66.5%This article: 2.8%Sean Joseph: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination2.8%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sean Joseph: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Sean Joseph: 6.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.7%

391 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers15%attributed speech332writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageScreencaps • 28 words • 100.0% coverageJoe • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Tanner • 5 words • 100.0% coverageEmily Tanner • 3 words • 0.0% coverageEmily Tanner • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Screencaps

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words47% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Screencaps: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+30.1 ptsWriter: 69.9%Screencaps: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -12.7 ptsWriter: 12.7%Screencaps: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.3 ptsWriter: 3.3%Screencaps: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.