Speaker summary
66% 2 analyzed articles/videos 641.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scottie Scheffler results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 146 hits . Analysis detected 1,026.672 faulty-reasoning hits from 641.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,547 of 28,364 speakers). This Scottie Scheffler is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Scottie Scheffler
Speaker details
Total words: 641.5
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.4% percentile 7.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos641.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 21.3% 21.3% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 16.4% 16.4% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 13.7% 13.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.0% 15.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Anecdotal: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 8.1% Special Pleading: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 0.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Middle Ground: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% No True Scotsman: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst