DeChambeau penalized 2 shots at British Open after Herbert and Burns shoot 62s in wild 2nd round 16%

By Associated Press60%

7/17/2026, 9:03:53 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.5% saturation with 343 hits. Analysis detected 1,419 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,125 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (18,534 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the article peer group.

By DOUG FERGUSON 
SOUTHPORT, England (AP)  The British Open came to life Friday when Lucas Herbert and Sam Burns took their place in history by tying the major championship record with 62s, and Bryson DeChambeau was penalized two shots after his round for inadvertently improving the path of his swing. 
In the midst of all the late drama was Jon Rahm getting an official conduct warning for throwing his club after a bad tee shot. 
The real emotion came in the twilight hours with no spectators around  DeChambeau standing in high grass on the fifth hole with two rules officials, pleading his case and ultimately losing the argument. 
His 4-under 66 became a 68, and he went from one shot behind Herbert to three behind. 
And then he went to the range until the only light came from the video boards. 
DeChambeau has turned down media at the majors dating to his missed cut at the Masters in April. 
Herbert, who was at 8-under 132, was slightly disappointed with his record-tying round because he missed a 5-foot par putt that would have given him a 61. 
“Very, very proud to put my name on that list of guys that have shot 62 in a major championship. 
So it’s kind of holding two emotions there at the same time,” Herbert said. 
“It’s a pretty good problem to have, too, to be disappointed you shot 62.” 
Burns didn’t even know he tied a record when he holed a bunker shot on the 18th for his third straight birdie, just 22 minutes after Herbert shot his 62. 
But there was no mistaking the frustration of DeChambeau, who tends to draw attention no matter what he does. 
He has been more visible on his successful YouTube channel than in the majors, particularly having missed the cut in all three of them until this week. 
Six-time major champion Nick Faldo criticized him for having no strategy for links golf, and DeChambeau responded by working his way into contention with plenty of power. 
DeChambeau was hand-slapping with the gallery after he made a 12-foot birdie putt on the 18th to get within one shot of Herbert going into the weekend. 
That changed when officials asked him to review his shot from the fifth hole. 
DeChambeau asked to be taken to the scene of the infraction, in thick, high grass to the right of the 321-yard hole, and television cameras picked him up arguing with Grant Moir, the R&A executive director of governance, and Mark Luiten, a chief referee from the European tour. 
He drove well to the right and was stomping around as he tried to figure out how to navigate a shot 72 yards from the hole. 
At issue was whether he violated Rule 8 that governs the intended swing. 
Officials eventually deemed a section of grass behind the ball was tamped down by his movement, which might have affected his backswing on the shot. 
“A player is allowed to fairly take their stance by taking reasonable actions to get to the ball and take a stance, if in some situations that improves the condition affecting the stroke,” Moir said. 
“But when doing so, the player must take the least intrusive course of action to deal with the particular situation and is not entitled to a normal stance or swing.” 
He said the rule applies even when there is no intention to improve the area. 
Even more drama followed when DeChambeau stormed off to the range. 
His agent, Brett Falkoff, was asked if the two-time U.S. 
Open champion would play on Saturday and replied, “We’ll see.” 
“Your guess is as good as mine,” the agent said. 
Herbert was long gone when all this was taking place, with mixed emotions about a short miss on the final hole but proud to become the sixth person to shoot 62 in a major. 
And then Burns made it seven with his astonishing finish  a 40-foot birdie putt from off the green at the 16th, a 20-foot birdie on the 17th and the first birdie of the day on the 18th with his bunker shot. 
Burns wasn’t even supposed to be at The Open. 
His wife was due with their second child this week, but when she had a daughter earlier than expected  July 3  Burns decided last Friday to cross the Atlantic for another shot at a major. 
He was runner-up by one shot in the U.S. 
Open. 
When the dust finally settled on the brown-baked links of Royal Birkdale, the only clarity was Herbert having his first 36-hole lead in a major. 
And golf's oldest championship, which rarely lacks for drama, had almost more than it could handle. 
Defending champion Scottie Scheffler couldn’t buy a putt until a 12-footer for par on the final hole gave him a 68 and left him only four shots behind. 
“All you can do is continue to give myself opportunities,” Scheffler said. 
“I was hitting some good putts as well, the balls just weren’t dropping. 
 If I continue to strike it like I did today and yesterday over the next couple days, I’ll be in a good spot.” 
Jackson Suber (69) and Ryan Gerard (67), a pair of newcomers to links golf, were tied for second with Cameron Young, who has powerfully put together a pair of 67s as he looks more like the player who dominated the spring. 
Rahm, who missed a 4-foot birdie putt on the final hole and shot 67, was very much in the mix just four shots behind and not about to change his intensity, even though another conduct violation would be a two-shot penalty. 
“It’s not like I’m going to  if I try to alter who I am too much, it might cost me a little bit on the course,” Rahm said. 
“But certainly shouldn’t have moments like the one on 15. 
I get it.” 
Sixteen players were separated by four shots going into the weekend, which includes hometown star Tommy Fleetwood, who had three birdies over the last five holes for a 67. 
The cut was at 1-over 141 and a few of England's best hopes won’t be around  Matt Fitzpatrick, the No. 3 player in the world, and Justin Rose at No. 
10. 
Herbert, who has won on five tours around the world and most recently on LIV Golf, made the cut for only the 10th time in 18 majors. 
He made it look easy until the final hole, and now his thoughts shift from having his name in the record book to his name on the claret jug. 
___ 
AP golf: https://apnews.com/hub/golf 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.2%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Associated Press: 3.2%Baltimore Sun: 3.2%Availability Heuristic7.6%This article: 3.6%Associated Press: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Associated Press: 1.1%Baltimore Sun: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias4.7%This article: 12.1%Associated Press: 7.1%Baltimore Sun: 4.1%Framing Effect12.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.6%Associated Press: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.0%Associated Press: 2.1%Baltimore Sun: 3.4%Optimism Bias9.0%This article: 6.1%Associated Press: 1.6%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Pessimism Bias6.1%This article: 12.7%Associated Press: 8.7%Baltimore Sun: 5.2%Negativity Bias12.7%This article: 2.9%Associated Press: 2.0%Baltimore Sun: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias2.9%This article: 1.7%Associated Press: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error1.7%This article: 1.7%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.1%Associated Press: 2.3%Baltimore Sun: 3.4%Halo Effect9.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Associated Press: 1.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.3%Recency Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.2%Associated Press: 3.4%Baltimore Sun: 2.2%Appeal to Authority5.2%This article: 3.6%Associated Press: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 1.6%False Dilemma3.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.7%Baltimore Sun: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.0%Associated Press: 4.7%Baltimore Sun: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion3.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.2%Baltimore Sun: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.7%Baltimore Sun: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Middle Ground2.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.3%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.9%This article: 3.1%Associated Press: 1.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection3.1%This article: 30.5%Associated Press: 3.0%Baltimore Sun: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice30.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 3.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 4.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1125 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers22%attributed speech883writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageLucas Herbert • 20 words • 0.0% coverageLucas Herbert • 14 words • 0.0% coverageLucas Herbert • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Moir • 35 words • 100.0% coverageGrant Moir • 30 words • 0.0% coverageGrant Moir • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageBrett Falkoff • 10 words • 100.0% coverageBrett Falkoff • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageScottie Scheffler • 12 words • 0.0% coverageScottie Scheffler • 13 words • 0.0% coverageScottie Scheffler • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageJon Rahm • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJon Rahm • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJon Rahm • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAP • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Scottie Scheffler

100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words20% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-38.8 ptsWriter: 38.8%Scottie Scheffler: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.