Keyword summary
83%5 analyzed articles/videos1,960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bryson Dechambeau results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,557 hits. Analysis detected 9,765 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,376 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (29,694 of 36,903 keywords). This Bryson Dechambeau is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Bryson Dechambeau
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
20%Bryson Dechambeau (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,376
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510019.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.7%13.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate