Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Waguespack results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 357.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,956 of 28,364 speakers). This Scott Waguespack is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Scott Waguespack
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
60.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos