Speaker summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video31.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Fiedler results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 42 faulty-reasoning hits from 31.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (9,802 of 28,364 speakers). This Scott Fiedler is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Scott Fiedler
Speaker details
Total words: 31.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos