Speaker summary
⁠31%2 analyzed articles/videos106.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Evans results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 139 faulty-reasoning hits from 106.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (23,461 of 28,364 speakers). This Scott Evans is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Scott Evans
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 106.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.3% percentile
12.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos106.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos