Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Anderson results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 126 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (9,800 of 28,364 speakers). This Scott Anderson is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Scott Anderson
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510065.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos