Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video244.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scarlet Kim results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 105.195 hits. Analysis detected 551.651 faulty-reasoning hits from 244.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,564 of 28,364 speakers). This Scarlet Kim is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Scarlet Kim
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 244.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510027.5% percentile
17.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos244.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 40.1%40.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 14.1%14.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.1%14.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 40.1%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos