Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,983 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jude Joffe-Block results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 2,108 hits. Analysis detected 14,872 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,517 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (4,890 of 6,244 authors). This Jude Joffe-Block is better (less manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Jude Joffe-Block
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
22%Jude Joffe-Block (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 20,517
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

22% percentile
025507510021.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles20.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.3%10.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate