Speaker summary
ā 74%1 analyzed article/video191.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah McBride results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 596.299 faulty-reasoning hits from 191.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.5% and a BS Rank of ā 26% (21,145 of 28,364 speakers). This Sarah McBride is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Sarah McBride
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 26%Sarah McBride (selected)17%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 191.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
16.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos191.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 27.0%27.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.1%19.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 21.8%21.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.0%15.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.6%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos