Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video100.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Dean results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Primacy Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 67.9% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 273 faulty-reasoning hits from 100.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,282 of 28,364 speakers). This Sarah Dean is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Sarah Dean
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 100.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.6% percentile
31.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos100.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 67.9%67.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.8%35.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.9%17.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Indoctrination: Speaker 67.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 6.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 0.0%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos