Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video344.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Benatar results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 976.158 faulty-reasoning hits from 344.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,141 of 28,364 speakers). This Sarah Benatar is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
Sarah Benatar
Speaker details
Total words: 344.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.4% percentile
10.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos344.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.6%13.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos