Speaker summary
⁠51%4 analyzed articles/videos180.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 520.461 faulty-reasoning hits from 180.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (21,844 of 28,364 speakers). This Sarah is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Sarah
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.0% percentile
15.3% BS Score4 analyzed videos180.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.0%11.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos